The theory and practice, the art and science, the challenges and rewards of reading and writing history. We will examine various historiographical approaches, while seeking to answer questions such as: What is history? Why do we do it? And what makes good historical research?
History is the study of the past, but this simple definition begs more questions than it answers. Whose past? What aspects of the past? How can the past be studied, when even the present defies our efforts to understand it in all its complexities? Students will be encouraged to grapple with these and other challenges as part of their introduction to the task of “doing” history.
This section of HIST 2003 has been built around the notion that the modern historian’s craft is in some ways similar to that of medieval and early modern inquisitors. Both seek (or sought) to discover “the truth” about what people did and/or believed in the past—with very different motives, perhaps, but often following the same methodologies of reading and interpreting written, artifactual and oral testimonies. Fascinatingly, the archival records of European inquisitions themselves have recently emerged as hotly-contested sources for studying some of the least-known peoples of the past: religious and cultural “minorities”, for example, whose oppression and/or extinction ensured that they left few if any records of their own. Students will consider important problems in this field, forming their own opinions concerning its promises and problems.
- Teacher: Robin Vose