Khalil feels justified in dealing drugs because he needs the money to pay medical bills. What do you think of this decision? What does the novel tell us about the cycle of poverty and crime in society today? What are the solutions? Use the novel as much as possible to address this situation.
I agree with your analysis! I find it sad that Khalil got sucked into the cycle when he disagreed with it so much simply because of his love for his addict mother. It proved how good of a person he was and how much he did not deserve to die. Further, I like how you talked about Big Mav, Starr's father and how he seemed to be the exception to the rule of never escaping the cycle of poverty and crime. I admired his character a great deal for how strong he was and how good of a role model he seemed to be for not only his own kids but to everyone in the community. Khalil and Devante both seemed to look up to him.
Just wanted to comment on a comment you made. Khalil was a great guy that was wrapped up in the wrong crowd, which happens often in the cycle of poverty, in any community. However, I think that no matter how good or bad a person is, this does not or should not determine whether or not they "deserve to die."
This opinion is often very controversial in arguments that often bring up dictators or capital punishment. Since most states no longer have capital punishment, even on figures who commit war crimes/genocide/crimes against humanity, etc., it is important to remember that even when people do bad things, we as a society have programs or attempt to implement programs that can help them, rather than just simply thinking "they did a bad thing =they are a bad person = they deserve to die."
Carter’s father was a major gang member, so he was considered a legacy member. Maverick shows us that it is not impossible to break the cycle, and as you mention first, it is hard to do so.
However, I think that Maverick had an easier "out" than other gang members do.
1) He was at the top - and it was lonely
Being a legacy, he knew what it was like at the top, and didn't think it was worth it. In these gangs, a lot of people are looking for "brotherhood" and a source of income, because they live in an environment where they do not have access to either. Because Maverick was a legacy gang member, he was welcomed by everyone at a young age into the group, and once he saw that his "so-called brothers" were willing to let him go to jail for them, he must have had an epiphany that being at the top is lonely, even though it appears welcoming. The reason why the other gang members are not so much willing to leave is most likely because they cannot afford to do so, and they want to know what inclusion feels like. They strive to "get to the top" and be one of the major players because it means more respect, responsibility and status. They can never realize how lonely it is at the top until they spend so much timing work to get there. Since Maverick had all of that without working towards that for himself (as a legacy), he did not feel the need or see the benefits to stay.
2) He had an opportunity that many other gang members did not have - a support system and a plan
Gangs make a lot of money and not all of them have the means outside of the gang to leave. Also, not everyone is a legacy like Carter, so they do not have the same respect and protections that he has, since they all had to "prove" their way in. Once you work hard to prove your way into a gang, it can also be difficult to want to leave since that false sense of brotherhood can feel realistic if you have no other support systems. This is why it is easier for Maverick to leave once he has a child because he knew he had to become a support system for Seven, especially since Iesha was not a good mum. So he gained a support system that was his son and his family role and made a plan to get income elsewhere. Since he had a lot of money from being on top of the gang, he didn't need to worry about financial risk like other members do if they choose to leave. (However, children are a very common reason to leave a gang and I am sure that many others left to support their children and broke the cycle that way as well. It just isn't mentioned in the story.)
Last semester, I did an analysis of Aboriginal gangs in Winnipeg, and it really helped me see the point of view from their perspective. Who better to ask about why people stay in gangs than gang members themselves?
Here is a Vice YouTube doc of the interviews where aboriginal gang members explain their situations.
Relating this back to Maverick, once you go against your gang, you are tossed to the side. That is the downside of "brotherhood". If you are not ALL IN, then you are out. Maverick, once he had a child, had new values that he did not share with his fellow brothers, and I think that is why he decided to break the cycle. So while having a child and going to jail are definitely reasons to break the poverty cycle, I feel it is necessary to dig deeper to understand why Maverick really wanted to leave.
Khalil's mother was addicted to drugs, which made her an unreliable parent and source of income. She was unable to support her son or ill mother, instead, becoming another person to assist. In this way, Khalil was left to pick up some of this slack so that the bills could be paid. This individualistic, neo-liberal approach of trying to fix a problem within one's family without sufficient support from the state is not effective. In this way, I think that a possible solution would be state assistance to support these families so that these burdens do not fall onto the children. The cycles of crime and poverty appear to intersect, as to get out of poverty, these kids were becoming criminals. You should not have to trade one cycle for another. In this way, state intervention should come in the form of other legitimate and adequate options for these individuals so that these cycles can stop.
I think this synthesizes Starr's main point: her frustration with the media's insistence to focus on whether Khalil was in a gang or dealt drugs, and whether this should be an admissible factor in his murder. The police begin to construct this narrative as early as their first questioning of Starr.
I think the inclusion that Khalil sold drugs to help his mother is a detail that should have been irrelevant to the case. It shouldn't have mattered to the public perception of him. The fact that the the police detectives and the interviewer were so consumed with this detail demonstrates the way that the public views victimization. There should not have to be this character virtue in order for people to sympathize with Khalil's murder.
Similarly, media outlets attached onto the idea that George Floyd was an alleged drug addict, that Breonna Taylor was an alleged drug dealer, that Jacob Blake was an alleged abuser, as if these would be some sort of mitigating factor in their murder. The idea that if you commit a crime, you are asking to be shot unarmed, is what I think Starr is trying to refute in her interview.
Anyway, I realize that I sort of hijacked this question, I just thought that this may be a point worth making.
Contrast that with people of colour when charged with something or killed for that matter. We get headlines that are sensationalized with racist words like thugs and we get awful mugshots -- never anything to humanize the person.
So no, you didn't hijack the question -- you've expanded it and that is exactly what I want to see!
I really like your analysis! I also found it upsetting that Starr seemed to think they were abandoning the community by moving out of it. I also think some of the neighbours thought this as well and blamed them for leaving. I think this is wrong. I agree with what you said, they don't need to be living in Garden Heights to "give a damn". I think this is a problem for our country as well. I think a lot of people don't think they can do anything to help this vast issue due to not living in the right area or what have you. I want people to begin to realize that to help and care you don't need to be next door, you just have to use your voice to speak out against these injustices and fight for what is right!
It is truly difficult to help other people when you are stuck right there with them. The common expression is something like "put your oxygen mask on before helping other people with theirs, or else you'll die trying". We cannot save people from drowning if we are in the same sinking boat. This book highlights parallels for me from my youth that I do not like to think about. I can relate to Starr's double identity, and her need to support her people without leaving the community - because she feels it is betrayal.
When it comes to Khalil selling drugs, I believe he did so as he needed a way to make money (on pg.12 we learn that Khalil's grandma has cancer and he is also helping raise his older brother). He did what he had to do in order to survive. Growing up, Khalil watched his mother struggle with addiction (pg. 12), and she would not get clean until after her sons death. When you grow up around these situations, they become your 'normal'. Starr talks a lot in the book about how in Garden Heights, people do what they need to in order to survive. Starr leads us to the idea throughout the book that the deck is stacked against the people in Garden Heights from the time that they are born.
The crime and poverty cycle is an idea that comes up through out the book. A really prominent example of this thought is when Starr is talking about her father Maverick, and how he broke that cycle. Maverick's dad was one of the biggest drug kings in Garden Heights and his son would later join the gang (pg. 174). Starr then talks about her father going to prison (pg.119) and how he wasn't around for a lot of her "firsts", but her Uncle Carlos was always stepping in-after his release from prison, Maverick worked hard to break the cycle of poverty and trouble for his children. Maverick himself always mentions this is DeVante when he says "I was officially done with the King Lord shit, drug shit, all of it" (pg. 176). DeVante is also another important character to look at- he knows what he is doing is wrong and he wants to break the cycle of crime and poverty (which is requests Maverick's help with in chapter 10). The novel allows us to see that there are other options available, however, these circumstances and life paths are very hard to get out of once in, but it is not impossible.
I found Khalil's past one of the most important aspects of the book. I have to admit, in the beginning, before we learned that he was seeking the drugs to get his mother out of debt and help his family, I kind of judged him for getting into the same business that made his mom a stranger to him. When I learned the real reason it really made me take a step back and analyze my thought process. I feel like this is what happens in the real world too. The media never gives us the real, full story and so we are left to make a biased opinion on what we presume to know. Well done!
In a conversation with her father, Starr asks “why was he a drug dealer? Why are so many people in our neighborhood drug dealers?” to which Maverick explains the lack of opportunities in their community, and how it perpetuates the cycle of poverty and crime, where individuals feel they do not have any other options but to sell drugs in order to survive (169). It is easy to look at Khalil’s decision and see it as unjustifiable however, that would be to see the issue from a place of privilege. Khalil grew up watching his mother battle with addiction where she would “go clean a few weeks, decide she wants one more hit, then be back at it” (13). In short, witnessing addiction is all that Khalil ever knew and when he found out that his mother stole from King, he started selling drugs to pay back the debt (237). While Khalil did not want to sell drugs, he did so in order to protect his mother and support his family—therefore demonstrating how the cycle of poverty and crime is perpetuated, and how it is difficult to break.
Like Maverick explains, the Garden Heights community has a lack of opportunity. This allowed me to reflect on the fact that the first step in addressing the situation surrounding poverty and crime is to introduce programs in the community that look to address addiction and provide employment opportunities to help break the cycle. Instead of ignoring the issue and seeing it as a “choice” it is important to acknowledge the many factors that can lead to this decision, and for that reason, I do believe Khalil’s decision is justifiable.
Racism in job opportunities is also contributing to poverty because black people have less opportunities for jobs that could help them escape it, but DeVante shows this when he explains the poor working conditions at McDonalds in Garden Heights. Starr's mom worked at the clinic, which was most likely one of the best jobs in Garden Heights, but again she had to go to school to become a nurse, and if you don't finish high school or have bad experiences with school because your school isn't up to the standards they should be, you are less likely to go further your education. It seems to me that the school system is the main reason why a lot of people fall into poverty, which is why the solution would be to change and invest in it.
I think that police attempt to try to better their image by being "the friendly neighbourhood cop" which, if it actually was with good intentions, could help kids get educated about gangs and drugs and how to sustain a better life. However, social programs need to provide supports for families who end up in these situations, or else the education that police provide would mean nothing. Often times throughout our own history though, the police behaving friendly was only to deter "radicals" from "evil vices". They do not actually care about the kids because they are only looking out for "the common good of the 'people.'"
I think the cycle of poverty and crime is a huge theme in this novel and that Maverick hits the nail right on the head when he discusses the acronym for THUG LIFE. (More on that in the other discussion post.) Essentially, when you give people hate, you force obstacles in their path for no other reason but biases, discrimination, prejudice, and inequality. This causes people to look elsewhere for help to move around those obstacles that society forces into place. Drugs, prostitution, gambling, and trafficking are common paths that people go down when they are trapped in financial situations that they cannot get help out of. The banks are unforgiving and very reserved. Asking family members for a payout feels burdening and awkward. So instead, people go down dangerous paths because they have no options left because society fucked them over. Social programs that do not discriminate need to be in place to help aid people when they have nowhere else to turn to, but there are needs to be programs that PREVENT people from ever being in such a position.
I agree with all of your points and appreciate how you mentioned labeling theory and its application to the cycle of poverty and crime. In the novel, we are able to see the many inequalities faced by the Garden Heights community, namely the lack of opportunities that have forced individuals to turn to drug dealing and crime as a way to support themselves and their families. In relation to your mention of labelling theory, it is easy to judge someone for their decision to sell drugs and label them as “deviant”, but to judge them is to fail to acknowledge the various circumstances that may have influenced their choice. When Black communities have been set up to fail by a lack of opportunities and blatant discrimination, and individuals must turn to means such as drug dealing, the title of “deviant” is given to them when they should instead be provided with resources to help to break the cycle.
I agree that the education system must be improved, and that safe community centres would be beneficial in providing a place where children can go to escape a toxic environment. I also believe that criminal justice reform is necessary to address mass-incarceration, and to promote community-based social programs. From an outside perspective, it is easy to say that a solution to the problem is for people not to turn to crime however, it is evident that the cycle of poverty and crime is deeply woven into many communities, and it is necessary that resources, opportunities, and social programs are put into place to foster understanding, and to further lead to change.
Being a King Lord in Garden Heights symbolizes power, respect, and wealth. The structure of Garden Heights is hierarchical, the King Lords and their families being at the top of the rank, following the Garden disciples then there is everyone else. The life of a King Lord is glamorized by society. This is evident on pages 203-204 when DeVante finds out Mavericks father is Big Don a notorious drug dealer from Garden Heights and responds as though he is a celebrity. Maverick was set to repeat the themes of crime and poverty passed down through generations in underdeveloped drug-filled communities like Garden Heights. Maverick became a King Lord when he was twelve and kinging brought more respect, money, luxury, and safety. (pg. 204) Maverick becoming a father was the thing that took him out of Kinging because he wanted to repeat the same cycle with his children that he endured, but it wasn’t easy he had to give up money, his connections and safety. (Pg 204) Even though Maverick has a strong connection to Garden Heights, him and Lisa took steps to not allow their children to become the bad things Garden Heights represents. They send the kids to Williamson to get quality education, make them work at the store to understand the importance of labor work, and punish them when they put themselves in situations of danger. We see this being repeated with DeVante, being involved with King and the Garden Disciples he was on a path to prison or death. (pg 205) Maverick and Carter stop the cycle DeVante was in by taking him in, giving him work at the store, and grounding him when he put himself in danger with King.
I think you have to understand these underlying factors before justifying Khalil’s decision to sell drugs. Yes, he did have a job at the store, but the minimum wage wasn’t adequate enough to support the necessities his family needed while paying for his grandmother’s medical bills. When the people you love are at risk, you aren’t necessarily thinking about what is morally right. He didn’t have a strong support system to guide him on the right path once his grandmother became sick. Most of those who were able to escape crime in Garden Heights still struggle due to little job opportunities, and on the other hand, those who commit to the life of crime have everything they need and more. I don’t think Khalil was thinking about the consequences of this lifestyle but yet the solutions it would bring. I don’t think it is okay that Khalil was selling drugs, however, given his situations and the circumstances he was under I understand how he felt justified.
I think it is really sad that it is easier to repeat the cycle of crime and poverty than it is to leave it and struggle. Once you enter, it is even harder to leave especially in underdeveloped areas that already don’t provide adequate numbers of jobs, quality educational, and government support. Sadly this is bigger than the novel and is represented in many real-life underdeveloped communities. We cannot know the solution to this without living it firsthand, but I think governments need to dedicate more attention to these communities and equip them with proper support such as mental, financial, and addiction counseling services as well as additional educational support. Why do we see art projects, entertainment centers, and corporate-based companies being funded in urbanized places before providing underdeveloped communities with the necessities needed for growth? This is more than an issue of 'lack of' funding.
It is difficult for me to say that I condemn Khalil for his drug dealing. He was teenager on his own, I cannot imagine the struggles associated with such a situation, so I cannot judge him based on the choice he made.
Starr has the opportunity to attend an upscale high school but this certainly is not the case for most inner-city youths. The differences in available resources and opportunities provided among schools play a huge role continuation of this cycle. I would suggest providing quality resources to all schools regardless of the community they are in. It makes absolutely no sense to me, that countries like the United States are concerned about crime, but allow situations like the underfunding of inner-city schools to continue.
Your thoughts are so clear and I agree with all of them. I wanted to touch on Khalil's grandmother's case specifically as it shows how capitalism and the system are built to forget the poor classes. The irony of her working for a hospital, the same that is draining her from money and just stacking debt on her, while also not letting her work for the income. Healthcare comes up multiple times in the novel as something not quite affordable. For example, when DeVante gets beat by King, Chris's first reaction is to get him to the hospital but everyone else understood why DeVante would refuse.
I recently read another YA novel focusing on the underfunding of schools in the US in marginalized communities. The reality of many budges for education being cut for "security purposes" like the police force in high schools. The name is "Anger is a gift" by Mark Oshiro.
While a solution could have been to seek out help from Starr’s father at the store, it was made clear that Khalil could not earn enough money solely working at the store. This also brings to light that Khalil could only manage to obtain a job through personal connections, rather than the normal route Williamson students can explore. I think this idea lends itself to the mindset Hailey has throughout the novel. Hailey is so quick to judge Khalil for his choices without factoring in the circumstances which led him there. Moreover, Hailey does not question the role of the police despite the fact that police are not justified or legally permitted to shoot Khalil even if he was guilty.
It seems to be clear that without experiencing poverty, it is hard to truly understand the struggles of every day life. This encompasses Hailey and other Williamson students privilege and ignorance as they do not understand poverty and therefore do not understand its fluidity with crime. Furthermore, students like Hailey cannot seem to grasp that they are equally culpable for the crime present in impoverished areas.
Most students on here have had a change of heart since reading other comments, but it is important to realize that without discussions such as these, those initial thoughts could have remained the same.
As someone who did grow up near the poverty line and shared a room with her brother as a teenager because we could not afford a place for all 6 of my family members, I have seen first hand how easy it is to resort to vices. When you can't get a job, and when you can't afford rent, or gas, or food, or other bad habits that you use to cope such as smokes or alcohol, it can be very appealing to do jobs that are under the table. The media makes drug dealing sound luxurious - like if you deal enough weed or cocaine, you can be a millionaire. We even see this in the novel since King has many BMW's and no amount of money is spared to support his family. Once you start dealing drugs, it can be easy to fall into a pattern because 1) it is hard to find work when your resume for x amount of time is blank - showcasing that you just appear lazy, and 2) it can be easy to start doing the drugs you deal since the opportunity is a constant and it makes selling drugs easier since you can relate to the clients, and you can personally attest to the "product" that you are selling.
So, real life versus this novel is quite a contrast. It can be easy to discuss this within a safe group of educated individuals, but it just as important to remember that in real life, whenever someone is dealing drugs, we should not judge them too harshly. There is almost always a valid reason for their actions, which can be helped with programs, rather than judgement.
The novel highlights the cycle of poverty and crime by showing us how hard it is to escape, especially without means or motivation. The solution is clear - we need more programs that target the primary issue, not exactly the problem itself. The problem should not be targetted head-on but should be analyzed so we know how to prevent the problem from occurring. Ex. instead of criminalizing drugs, we should provide more affordable needs such as food and housing, and accessible affordable supports such as counselling, or mental health and rehab centers. People cannot stop their habits and addictions without 3 things: 1) support system of people such as family, doctors, counsellors, etc. 2) aid to their initial problem, which lead them to drugs in the first place (affordable housing, counselling, maybe encouragement for a new club, sport, group of friends, partner, etc. if a minor or student is into it from peer pressure, etc.) 3) A plan using taught tools to deter them every time they have withdrawals. All 3 things require aid from some sort of government program or programs.
This directly reflects impoverished places within our own communities here in the West. People in these impoverished places have a lack of education, financial stability, etc. and thus turn to crime to provide for their family. If these places had the same resources available to them as any one of us do, they wouldn’t have to join gangs, sell drugs, or anything else for that matter to provide for themselves and their families with what they need to have a happy, healthy life. But it is more than likely easier said than done. With politicians ignoring these communities, a lack of a quality economy, police arresting and criminalizing residents, the poverty won’t end, and the crime will continue so that they can stay afloat.