I am not fully convinced by Hunts hypothesis that novel reading created human rights and new social movements. Where I do agree is that novels are a source of learning or influencing empathy. This connection is especially influential when the reader is able to develop a sense of ‘self’ or ‘friendship’ with the characters in the novel. When reading novels with a strong character connection, such as in the way epistolary novels are designed to be, it’s easier to feel as though you're experiencing the character's struggles directly. I think this is enough to influence empathy or inspire people, but I do not believe that empathy from novels was enough to instill drastic social and cultural changes as Hunt argues. I understand the connection Hunt is trying to make and think there is importance in gaining empathy from novels, but the final argument to me feels like a stretch.
I especially do not agree with the statement of novels created a sense of equality. I think the typical everyday character that Hunt describes allows a wide range of people to feel a connection, but I think that connection may merely inspire new emotions, don’t believe it is enough motivation, especially in the elite status, to force change.